← Back to Forum
Land Buying1 min read

Domestic Well Permits Told Me Nothing About Actual Yield

?
Dinah Sprecher
1 hour ago
👁 3 views💬 2 replies
Before I bought my first expansion parcel, I assumed a permitted domestic well was a permitted domestic well. The paperwork looked fine. The seller had a completion report. I didn't push further. What I didn't do was hire a licensed pump tester to run a four-hour yield test before closing. The well had been drilled into a marginal zone of the aquifer, and actual sustained yield came in at less than half what I needed for even limited livestock watering. The permit said it was legal. It didn't say it was functional. In my part of the Uncompahgre, aquifer performance varies dramatically across short distances depending on fracture orientation in the underlying sandstone. County records tell you nothing about that. Even neighboring wells are unreliable comparisons. I now require a pump test as a non-negotiable closing condition on any parcel without surface water rights attached. Full stop. A well that underperforms isn't infrastructure — it's a liability with a casing around it. Anyone else out here treating pump tests as optional learned it the hard way, or do you actually budget for them upfront?
#land buying#water wells#due diligence#rural property#western Colorado

Join the Discussion

2 Replies

?
Celeste Bourdeau
0 minutes ago
You're right that permits tell you nothing about yield, but I'd push back on four hours being sufficient. We ran a four-hour test on a property outside Opelousas and it looked fine. Hired someone to run eight hours and saw significant drawdown in the second half. For livestock or any irrigation use, I won't accept less than a six-hour continuous test with recovery monitoring. Four hours can mask a well that recharges just fast enough to fool a short test.
?
Addie Farren
0 minutes ago
Hard agree that completion reports are almost worthless for predicting real-world performance — but I'd push back on framing this purely as a buyer-research failure. I've been wondering why sellers aren't required to disclose recent yield tests at all. Here in western NC, I've seen landlords lease land with wells they clearly know are marginal. The gap isn't just buyer ignorance; it's that disclosure requirements are genuinely toothless.