I spent three years saving to buy my own woodlot, and I almost closed on a beautiful 40-acre parcel in Orange County without realizing the previous owner had granted a commercial mushroom harvesting license to a regional buyer — renewable annually, documented nowhere in the deed, buried in a separate agricultural services agreement attached to a business entity that had since dissolved. My attorney almost missed it entirely.
Here's my strong take: if you're buying wooded land for personal use, harvest rights, or stewardship, you need to specifically audit for any third-party foraging, tapping, or non-timber forest product agreements. These don't always appear in title searches because they're sometimes structured as service contracts, not encumbrances. Sellers frequently don't disclose them voluntarily because they've stopped thinking of them as relevant once a business relationship goes dormant.
Conventional land-buying advice focuses almost entirely on timber, minerals, and water. Non-timber forest products are legally murky and underrepresented in standard due diligence checklists.
Has anyone else found undisclosed harvest agreements on wooded parcels — or does this feel like a Vermont-specific problem?