Before I signed my first lease in the Hill Country, every agent I talked to pushed me toward raw acreage with 'great bones' and minimal prior use. The logic was clean land means a fresh start. I bought that completely — until I actually farmed leased ground with rich prior-use history and realized what I'd been told to avoid was actually gold.
Previous tenants who ran cover crops, composted, or rotated heritage grains leave behind soil biology you simply cannot rebuild in two or three seasons. My second leased plot had fifteen years of documented cover crop rotations from the prior tenant. My yields and infiltration rates on that ground embarrassed my 'clean' acreage in year one.
Now when I evaluate any parcel, leased or for sale, I dig hard into prior land-use records before I care about fencing, structures, or even water access. A motivated seller who can't explain what happened to their soil over the last decade is a red flag I'll never ignore again.
Anyone else found that 'heavily used' ground outperformed the pristine stuff once you knew what to look for?