I used to think a passed perc test was a passed perc test. Green light, move forward. Then I bought my six acres in West Virginia after a dry August and discovered the septic site that sailed through testing turned into a saturated nightmare every March through May. The seasonal water table here is a completely different animal than what that summer test captured.
Now I refuse to take perc results seriously unless I know exactly when they were run. Wet-season testing should be the baseline, not the exception — especially in ridge-and-hollow terrain where subsurface drainage behaves nothing like the flat lots most soil scientists trained on.
I've talked to three other buyers in my county who had the same rude awakening. None of us knew to ask. Our real estate attorneys didn't flag it. The county health department accepted the tests without comment.
If your seller's perc test was run in July or August in a region with heavy spring precipitation, that result is almost meaningless. Fight for wet-season re-testing or price the risk accordingly.
Does anyone else's region actually require seasonal testing windows, or is it still the honor system everywhere?