I learned this the hard way when my buddy group lost trail access to a 400-acre parcel we'd ridden for six years. The land sold, and the selling realtor had casually told us — and apparently the buyer too — that a two-track running along the creek was a 'traditional access route.' Nobody pulled the actual deed language. Turns out it was permissive access the old owner gave verbally, nothing recorded, nothing binding.
Here's my strong take: realtors are not access attorneys, and they are not your friend when it comes to easement interpretation. They repeat what sellers tell them. I've watched buyers — good, honest people — close on land assuming they had legal ingress for equipment, livestock, even recreational use, only to discover they owned a landlocked parcel with neighborly goodwill masquerading as legal right.
Before you close on anything rural, pay a real property attorney to review recorded easements specifically. Not the title company. Not your realtor. A real attorney with county deed experience.
Anybody else had a realtor confidently misrepresent access rights on a rural deal?