I spent two years eyeing a stretch of private ranchland in the upper Clark Fork drainage because it had a recorded public fishing access easement running along the main stem. Beautiful water, wild cutthroats, classic Montana riparian corridor. I assumed that easement was permanent — everybody does. Turns out it had a sunset clause tied to a federal conservation program renewal date, and that renewal was three years out with zero guarantee.
I almost bought adjacent parcels specifically to capitalize on that access corridor for guiding clients. Would have been a catastrophic business decision.
Now I pull the actual easement document, not just the title summary, on every piece of land near fishable water. I want to see the term length, the renewal conditions, and who holds enforcement authority. Recorded doesn't mean permanent. Permanent doesn't mean enforced.
If you're buying land specifically because of adjacent public access — stream, trail, or otherwise — are you actually reading the full easement instrument, or just trusting that it'll be there forever?