I almost closed on a gorgeous 80-acre parcel along a tributary creek before my attorney flagged a county stream setback ordinance that made roughly 30 acres effectively unbuildable and unfenceable without permits I'd never get approved. The seller disclosed nothing. The listing agent called it 'minor regulatory detail.' It wasn't minor — it killed my planned corral placement and a small cabin site I'd budgeted for.
Here's what I'd tell anyone buying land with any creek, ditch, or wetland feature: don't wait for the title company to surface setback ordinances. Pull the county floodplain administrator's records yourself before you're two weeks from closing. In Montana, these setback rules vary wildly by watershed, and state navigability designations can layer additional restrictions on top of county rules. I've seen buyers discover this after closing, which is a far uglier situation.
The parcel I eventually bought had clean riparian documentation, and I walked every foot of the creek corridor before signing.
Has anyone else found that their state's stream setback rules differed dramatically from county to county in ways the sellers never anticipated disclosing?