I bought a 160-acre parcel in 2009 partly on the strength of a timber cruise report the seller provided. Looked solid on paper — decent basal area, good species mix, merchantable volume estimates that made the asking price feel justified. What that report didn't capture was the age-class structure. Everything merchantable was clustered in one narrow age cohort. One bad ice storm, one beetle outbreak, and you've lost your entire standing value in a single event with nothing coming up behind it to recover.
Since then I've hired my own independent cruiser every single time, and I specifically ask for a stand structure breakdown by age class, not just volume. A forest with staggered age classes across multiple cohorts is worth considerably more to me than a single-layer stand with higher immediate board-foot volume.
Sellers almost never volunteer this. Their cruiser is measuring what makes the land look valuable today, not what it's going to look like in 15 years.
Anyone else been burned by a cruise report that technically wasn't wrong but still told you almost nothing useful?